Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- free_syllabus [2017/07/23 13:22]
yasmin
+++ free_syllabus [2017/10/04 10:50]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-======Try not. DO... Or do not. There is no try. —Yoda======
-===== Day 4 Sunday July 23, 2017 =====
-**Final Presentation
-**\\
-This is it. All subteams will give a 5-minute presentation on their artifacts. Audience members respond and make notes via Etherpad. After all presentations are complete, we will have a larger group discussion.
-====== The act of making a thing is the thing itself. —Workshop Project======
-===== Day 3 Saturday July 22, 2017 =====
-**Making It
-**\\
-Today you are translating theory into practice—making the abstract concrete. You will be producing a selection of artifacts for your proposed curriculum.
-  *You are not problem solving. A strategy to resist problem solving: Map the least practical aspect of your curriculum onto a practical artifact.
-  *The artifact should not be an external/objective description of your curriculum. It should come from inside the curriculum. It should be an example of what it is, not a description of what it is.
-  *Think of the artifacts(s) that you are making as a critical platform to reveal the implicit value system of your curriculum. How does the artifact give us an understanding of the macro structure and conceptual framework of the curriculum?
-**11-5pm Team Work Day**\\
-  -Propose 3 artifacts for your curricula. Post to the [[artifact_proposals|Artifact Proposals]] article on the wiki by 12pm. Each subgroup has been assigned an individual meeting time with visiting critics, Roosje Klap, Niels Schrader and Kali Nikitas also listed [[artifact_proposals|here]].
-  -Please post your working location along with your proposals so that the facilitators and MFA participants can drop in.
-  -Select which artifact(s) to make and make them. All artifacts should be complete by 5pm.
-  -Meet back in the Lighting Studio at 5pm.
-====== Thus in order to be a "radical" one must be open to the possibility that one's own core assumptions are misconceived —Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian======
-===== Day 2 Friday July 21, 2017 =====
-**Learning Objectives 2.0
-**\\
-  -We are not making a smarter version of what's already out there
-  -Pursue a line of inquiry beyond the limitations that you already recognize
-  -We are not solving problems
-  -Do not sacrifice your interests and agenda for consensus. Rehearse pluralism
-**Prompt: 11am Team Work Session**\\
-  -Each subgroup (Automation, Pluralism, Visual Rhetoric) is now building its own set of artifacts for the larger team.You should not assume that these artifacts have to share a single agenda or speak in a unified voice. They can diverge and still coexist.
-  -Designate at least 1 Etherpad note taker per group.
-  -Debate and decide on the following: You can only teach 1 concrete thing. What is it and why? Gather the following to support this proposal: At least 10 resources in any medium or format. At least 3 new lexicon terms
-  -Prepare a 5-minute presentation of your proposal to the whole group. This presentation can take any form. Discussion to follow.
-**Presentation: 2 pm, Lighting Studio**\\
-Guest critics: Roosje Klap and Niels Schrader
-===== Day 1 Thursday July 20, 2017 =====
-**FREE Team Breakdown
-**
-  -Each group (Hyper- and Post-Formalists) will divide into 3 subgroups: Automation, Pluralism, Visual Rhetoric.
-  -Discuss how Hyper- and Post-Formalism engage with Automation, Pluralism, Visual Rhetoric.
-{{pdfjs>:free_syllabus_v5.pdf |}}