Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
a_retroposthumanist_toolkit [2018/07/15 08:02] maryb |
a_retroposthumanist_toolkit [2018/07/15 16:59] erin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Church of the RetroPostHumanist <del>Educator</del> ====== | + | ====== Church of the RetroPostHumanist Editor ====== |
==== Navigating the Unknown Unknowns ==== | ==== Navigating the Unknown Unknowns ==== | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
**FORK** | **FORK** | ||
{{ :forking2.gif?nolink |}} | {{ :forking2.gif?nolink |}} | ||
- | You are not an author. Everyone is Editor. The collective does not prop up the past, the “precedent”, the “context.” Everyone is in editing mode for all cultural artifacts that came before and that are. This makes the collective all contributors and equals, at once writing, re-writing, and overwriting. <del>(something about archeology and simultaneity).</del> Editing is traceable, but not individuated. We employ archeology for generation of the new, not replication of the has been. | + | There are no authors. Everyone is Editor. The collective does not prop up the past, the “precedent”, the “context.” Everyone is in editing mode for all cultural artifacts that came before and that are. This makes the collective all contributors and equals, at once writing, re-writing, and overwriting. <del>(something about archeology and simultaneity).</del> Editing is traceable, but not individuated. We employ archeology for generation of the new, not replication of the has been. |
**EMBRACE THE VOID** | **EMBRACE THE VOID** | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
**CRIT NO ONE WAY** | **CRIT NO ONE WAY** | ||
{{ :noonewaycritique.gif?nolink |}} | {{ :noonewaycritique.gif?nolink |}} | ||
- | The critique is non-hierarchical. All the ways students imagine a critique. <del>Peers critique each other.</del> Peer-to-peer. Critique from non-experts. Critique from cats. Critique as writing. Critique as audio-recording. Critique as song. Critique as workout. Critique as recipe. Critique as food. Critique as meditation. Respond with an object. Forking is critique. No critique. | + | The critique is non-hierarchical. All the ways students could imagine a critique. <del>Peers critique each other.</del> Peer-to-peer. Critique from non-experts. Critique from cats. Critique as writing. Critique as audio-recording. Critique as song. Critique as workout. Critique as recipe. Critique as food. Critique as meditation. Respond with an object. Forking is critique. No critique. |
See the [[retroposthumanist|]] origins | See the [[retroposthumanist|]] origins |