Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
a_retroposthumanist_toolkit [2018/07/15 08:02]
maryb
a_retroposthumanist_toolkit [2018/07/15 16:59]
erin
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Church of the RetroPostHumanist ​<​del>​Educator</​del> ​======+====== Church of the RetroPostHumanist ​Editor ​======
 ==== Navigating the Unknown Unknowns ==== ==== Navigating the Unknown Unknowns ====
  
Line 29: Line 29:
 **FORK** ​ **FORK** ​
 {{ :​forking2.gif?​nolink |}} {{ :​forking2.gif?​nolink |}}
-You are not an author. Everyone is Editor. The collective does not prop up the past, the “precedent”,​ the “context.” Everyone is in editing mode for all cultural artifacts that came before and that are. This makes the collective all contributors and equals, at once writing, re-writing, and overwriting. <​del>​(something about archeology and simultaneity).</​del>​ Editing is traceable, but not individuated. We employ archeology for generation of the new, not replication of the has been. +There are no authors. Everyone is Editor. The collective does not prop up the past, the “precedent”,​ the “context.” Everyone is in editing mode for all cultural artifacts that came before and that are. This makes the collective all contributors and equals, at once writing, re-writing, and overwriting. <​del>​(something about archeology and simultaneity).</​del>​ Editing is traceable, but not individuated. We employ archeology for generation of the new, not replication of the has been. 
  
 **EMBRACE THE VOID** **EMBRACE THE VOID**
Line 45: Line 45:
 **CRIT NO ONE WAY** **CRIT NO ONE WAY**
 {{ :​noonewaycritique.gif?​nolink |}} {{ :​noonewaycritique.gif?​nolink |}}
-The critique is non-hierarchical. All the ways students imagine a critique. <​del>​Peers critique each other.</​del>​ Peer-to-peer. Critique from non-experts. Critique from cats. Critique as writing. Critique as audio-recording. Critique as song. Critique as workout. Critique as recipe. Critique as food. Critique as meditation. Respond with an object. Forking is critique. No critique.+The critique is non-hierarchical. All the ways students ​could imagine a critique. <​del>​Peers critique each other.</​del>​ Peer-to-peer. Critique from non-experts. Critique from cats. Critique as writing. Critique as audio-recording. Critique as song. Critique as workout. Critique as recipe. Critique as food. Critique as meditation. Respond with an object. Forking is critique. No critique.
  
  
  
 See the [[retroposthumanist|]] origins See the [[retroposthumanist|]] origins